C-RAN seems to have been a long time coming. I first started exploring the potential of C-RAN back in 2007. Since then there’s been a great deal of industry talk and thousands of pages of standards describing dozens of C-RAN architectures. And I’m still waiting.

Cloud RAN was meant to be all about simplifying things, but the architectural changes described in the standards are becoming feature heavy and extremely complex. In addition, one of the main tasks of standards is to ensure the security and reliability of the systems. The standards are meant to be the gold standard. This is important to the business case for cellular – especially in the enterprise. End-to-end security is one of the main advantages cellular has over Wi-Fi and the move to cloud-based systems threatens to compromise that advantage – for example, IEEE points to C-RAN vulnerabilities that include eavesdropping, denial of service and issues around authentication.

All this and more is tackled as part of the standards development process, but it comes at a price. Security adds still more complexity in the interfaces of the system.

What’s really slowing everything down are too many iterations of the standards, too many options, and a process that’s building in too much complexity to the C-RAN concept. This is the inevitable outcome of too much group think that needs to be honed down through exposure to real world deployments.

In the immediate future, there’s going to be a fair deal of trial and error via early deployments where we’ll get to understand what’s really important in the delivery of stable and efficient architectures and which of the nice to haves are best stripped out. This is a well-worn but sometimes painful process, but the outcome will be simpler than the current standards might imply and, eventually, able to deliver the gold standard in terms of reliability and security that are the hallmark of cellular solutions.

The main role for Real Wireless in this context is to help enterprises, neutral host and the industry at large understand how robust or otherwise C-RAN solutions are and whether they are worth investing in. Some architectures might not last for long. Decisions will be informed not just by network considerations, but by the current and prospective state of the device ecosystem.

Ultimately, bells and whistles features can always appear exciting but are generally less important than the core functionality a firm or sector needs to meet its connectivity requirements. And businesses need to be able to reach decisions without absorbing thousands of pages of technology standards or evaluating dozens of marketing pitches.

And while experts like Real Wireless can help support such decisions, the heavy lifting really needs to be done by the wireless industry itself in forging and committing to robust, practical and cost-effective C-RAN architectures that deliver end-to-end security, core and future-proofed functionality that meets business requirements and an attractive ecosystem of handsets and devices. Regulators can also play a part – maybe by recognising through a reduced annual licence fee mechanism, the positive environmental impact a C-RAN solution could have on city centre deployments of 5G systems.

 

News & Events

Can Satcoms at sea improve operations on land?

We write a lot about the needs of industry and how LTE, Wi-Fi, DAS and 5G, incorporated into a private network, could improve logistics and security and underpin just-in-time operations for airports, sea-ports, factories, stadiums, malls or local government. But what...

Connected vehicles: The long and winding road

The automotive industry’s goal was for every new vehicle to be connected by 2022. Now, less than 18 months out, things are more or less on track. But on track for what? M2M vehicle connectivity is already widely available.  This enables a vehicle to be connected to an...

Rail connectivity – further down the track

Passenger connectivity on trains is not a new topic. Unfortunately, neither are the issues it throws up. Of course one central problem doesn’t change. If you are trying to guarantee continuous communications and sufficient capacity to a moving village, issues like...

We are members of

Tech UK
Cambridge Wireless
Networld 2020
Telecom Infra Project
Wireless World Research Forum
Wireless World Research Forum
Telecom Infra Project

Our awards

 

We are members of

Tech UK
Cambridge Wireless
ESSMA
Networld 2020
Telecom Intra Project
Wireless World Research Forum

Our awards

BSI Assurance ISO
BSI Assurance ISO

Copyright ©2008- Real Wireless Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Company registered in England and Wales no. 6016945.
Registered address: Crown House, 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, WC1N 3AX.